Search for: "United States v. Sparks" Results 1 - 20 of 807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2022, 12:41 pm by Adam Lamparello
Wade and, in so doing, sparked impassioned reaction in the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:32 pm by Phil
On August 24, 2010, Karl Bayer, Special Master, filed his Report and Recommendations to United States District Judge Sam Sparks regarding the construction of claims in United States Patent No.'s 6,514,640 and 5.910,382 in the Hydro-Quebec and The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Audio of last week’s NMCCA argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
Last Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court upheld the first ever federal law banning certain abortion methods. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 5:56 am by alysondrake
She beat a 14-year incumbent for her spot in the United States House of Representatives, earning the nickname “Battling Bella. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am by Tess Bridgeman
” But the decision sparked outrage in domestic policy circles and consternation amongst coalition partners, who feared the United States was abandoning its Kurdish and Syrian allies to IS, as well as ceding strategic gains to Russia and Iran (and indeed, as U.S. forces withdrew from areas in the north, Russian forces swept in “to fill the void”). [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:54 pm
In light of our previous discussion, it seems amusing that Judges Baker and Ryan weren't present at the Southern University Law Center for CAAF's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 The complaint (full text) in Oregon-Idaho Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:54 pm by Harold O'Grady
” The statement came after US District Court Judge Sam Sparks’ Order in Armstrong v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:00 am by Edith Roberts
In January 2010, the court ruled 5-4 in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:06 pm by The Docket Navigator
Accordingly, it is ordered that this case is stayed pending final reexamination . . . by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]