Search for: "United States v. Spencer" Results 121 - 140 of 348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Bey argues that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:59 am by Holly
United States Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456, 1460 (Fed. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
He eventually brought his case to the Supreme Court, relying upon a law, 42 U.S.C. 1982, written and passed by Congress that says: "All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every state and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Joshua Matz
United States, a case about the harmless error standard. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Learmonth Oral Argument - Jackson, Mississippi lawyer Philip Thomas on the blog Mississippi Litigation Review and Commentary More Selective Statutory Interpretation By The United States Supreme Court - Philadelphia lawyer Max Kennerly of The Beasley Firm on his blog, Litigation & Trial How does a trial lawyer take a vacation - Seattle lawyer Karen Koehler on her blog, The Velvet Hammer [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:51 am by Carter Wood
" Here, then, are the topics being presented by attorneys from the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Sandy Levinson
 Giuliani and his fellow enabler Chris Christie have pointed out, probably correctly, that the sociopath broke no laws in zeroing out his participation in helping to finance what the United States does. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 11:09 am
Alternatively, if we find that Plaza's use was nonconforming at the time the ordinances were enacted, Plaza urges us to find the sexually oriented business ordinances unconstitutional pursuant to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers and other employee benefit plan sponsors, benefit plan fiduciaries, and their advisors and service providers should review and update their health and employee benefit plan’s definitions of “spouse,” “marriage” and “dependent” in light of new guidance from the Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division (WHD) guidance under the Family & Medical Leave Act and the Employee Benefit Security Administration (EBSA) guidance under the… [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
" However, Mastriani failed to provide evidence of an alternative rate that he would deem reasonable and necessary or otherwise to controvert Spencer's affidavit with controverting evidence. [read post]