Search for: "United States v. St. Clair" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Claire Poppelwell-Scevak, Strasbourg Observers: ‘Until Social Norms Say I Do’: How the Grand Chamber Taketh and Giveth Away in Fedotova and Others v Russia: on the recent case in which the GC ECtHR held that there is a positive obligation under Article 8 for member states to afford some sort of legal recognition and protection to same-sex couples. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:54 am
Subsequently, harder, thematic due diligence requirements have taken form through new measures on forced labour in the United States, legislation on child labour and conflict minerals due diligence passed in Switzerland, and proposals for EU batteries and deforestation regulations. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
The PRA states that “[t]he United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
They implicate fundamental questions about the role of courts in the United States’s constitutional structure. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Early life and career The 48-year-old Barrett grew up in Metairie, Louisiana, a suburb of New Orleans, and attended St. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:47 am by Gregory Ablavsky
Clair himself offered another interpretation of these apparent contradictions: the territories were not actually part of the United States and would only become so upon statehood. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:07 am by Guest Blogger
Clair himself offered another interpretation of these apparent contradictions: the territories were not actually part of the United States and would only become so upon statehood. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1]  This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]