Search for: "United States v. Stage Co"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
The case follows another recent related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:56 pm
McNamara secured the first race discrimination verdict in the United States against a real estate franchise for failure to award a sales agency to an African-American in Tyler v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Co.. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:24 am
United Telephone Co. of Ohio, 136 Ohio St.3d 231, 2013-Ohio-309. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 1:44 pm
Applying the United States Supreme Court’s recent class action decisions in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Carr --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:30 am
In Carolina Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided (State Farm Mutual Automobile… [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:42 pm
Co. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
On June 23, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
Corporate Liability under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 - Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum Co.
26 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
Coca-Cola Co. 578 F.3d 1252, 1263 (11th Cir. 2009); Romero v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:22 am
The petition of the day is: Title: Barr v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
June 23, 2014), the United States Supreme Court refused to overturn the landmark decision Basic v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am
In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:12 am
Halliburton Co., No. 09-1403 (June 6, 2011), the Supreme Court of the United States decided that in seeking class certification, a plaintiff in an action under the federal securities laws is not required to prove facts demonstrating loss causation. [1] In so holding, the Supreme Court rejected a contrary rule, adopted only by the Fifth Circuit, that proof of loss causation is a prerequisite to class certification. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Discusses Withdrawal Under Rule 36(b); Determines Lower Court Did Not Abuse Discretion
5 Apr 2007, 2:44 am
United States, 45 F.3d 1345, 1348 (9th Cir.1995); see also Carney v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:02 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
