Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co."
Results 181 - 200
of 471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
Slater decided that his future lay in emigrating to the United States, he faced such draconian trade-secrets laws in his native Britain (which tried to enforce them in a failed attempt to prevent new technology from arriving to the United States) that he had to keep his travel plans secret from family and friends, and disguise himself as a farm labourer. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
Hayes Fund for the First United Methodist Church of Welsh, LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:07 am
Hayes Fund for the First United Methodist Church of Welsh, LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm
Most other States have experienced unacceptably long processing and adjudication delays. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Indian Harbor Insurance Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
Cases of common-law-style and policy-laden judicial development of vague statutory standards are of course pervasive—I’ll limit myself here to a handful of cases. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
United States, 556 U.S. 559 (2009). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Shell Oil Co., C. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
Schwartz and Co. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
<> Oil Groups Ask Court to Temporarily Block U.S. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> State of Veracruz v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
v. [read post]
