Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co." Results 241 - 260 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Under the standard announced in Casey in 1992, the state’s interest in protecting fetal life attaches at the outset, rather than only when the fetus reaches viability. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
United States: The LA Times, the Chicago Sun Times, NBC Chicago, and the AP report on the news that the Court will not hear an appeal of the conviction of a doctor who allegedly shot a nurse to prevent her from testifying against him in a Medicare fraud case. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Don Cruse
American Home Assurance Co. and Illinois National Insurance Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Flowers Foods is the second-largest commercial bakery in the United States whose brands include Wonder Bread, Tastykake, Sunbeam, and Nature’s Own. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (DC Cir. 1923). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Thus the wrongful death statute is intended to compensate the pecuniary losses first and foremost of the decedent's immediate family, that is, his or her spouse and children, those most likely to have expected support and to have suffered pecuniary injury (see generally, Loucks v Standard Oil Co. of N.Y., 224 NY 99, 104 [1918] [Cardozo, J.]). [read post]