Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co." Results 161 - 180 of 468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
In the Curse of Bigness, Wu rejects the consumer-focused account of the Sherman Act articulated in Standard Oil v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Sean Wajert
  Customary international law includes only those standards, rules or customs affecting the relationship between states or between an individual and a foreign state, and used by those states for their common good and/or in dealings inter se. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:45 pm by Mark Murakami
United States v. $184,505.01 in the United States Currency, 72 F.3d 1160 (3rd Cir. 1995)(original opinion (here)):  this is an asset forfeiture case arising from an in rem proceeding against cash. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 521; the precedent consists of a rule that is judge-made and adopted to improve court operations, not a statute promulgated by Congress, see, e.g., State Oil Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]