Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Conagra can label its cooking oil "100% Natural," but may need to include different disclaimers in different states, to the extent that the label is seen as potentially misleading. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 7:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Other states are permitted to use either the federal standard or the California standard, but (unlike California) are not allowed to set their own standards that deviate from the federal norm. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am
“To the victims of gun violence and their families: California stands with you. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm
Uber hopes to deploy flying cars as soon as 2023 in major cities in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Third, we explain why existing disclosures in this area provide support for, rather than reason to oppose, standardized, mandatory climate-related disclosures. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
On appeal, plaintiff argued that the district court did not correctly apply the plausibility standard under the DTSA. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
” Recognizing that the Sherman Act could be read to bar all contracts, federal courts for over a century have interpreted the 1890 antitrust law only to apply to “unreasonable” restraints of trade.[7] The Supreme Court first adopted this concept in its landmark 1911 decision in Standard Oil, upholding the lower court’s dissolution of John D. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:15 pm
Campbell Soup Co., Alabama state court, and Andrade-Heymsfield v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
United States EPA (2021) U.S.Dist.LEXIS 163921.) [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
United States EPA (2021) U.S.Dist.LEXIS 163921.) [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:39 pm
This paper identifies a strong tendency for ESG event-driven actions to be settled in the United States, but drawn out in other markets. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Two separate classes of landowners are included in the suit as well as the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Two separate classes of landowners are included in the suit as well as the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am
While the Northern District of California, which had become known as the “food court” remained a popular jurisdiction for these suits, filings in New York outpaced those in California. [read post]
