Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California" Results 61 - 80 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
BACKGROUND: Plaintiff alleges defendant United States Coast Guard violated � 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), 16 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
The origins of forum non conveniens            In 1947 the Supreme Court decided Gulf Oil Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
The origins of forum non conveniens            In 1947 the Supreme Court decided Gulf Oil Corp. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by admin
” Then the other 49 states can adopt standards identical to California’s, or none whatsoever. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
California (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 621, 628.), an employer communicating to his or her employees (Dealie v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Alexander Gibson
The state courts of California, like many states, held that these sorts of contract provisions were unconscionable as applied to class actions. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
 While the Northern District of California, which had become known as the “food court” remained a popular jurisdiction for these suits, filings in New York outpaced those in California. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
 While the Northern District of California, which had become known as the “food court” remained a popular jurisdiction for these suits, filings in New York outpaced those in California. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
United States: The LA Times, the Chicago Sun Times, NBC Chicago, and the AP report on the news that the Court will not hear an appeal of the conviction of a doctor who allegedly shot a nurse to prevent her from testifying against him in a Medicare fraud case. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
 (Gray on Claims) District Court N D California: Compliance with accused industry standard does not justify joinder of defendants in a single action: Finisar Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 Esso Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]