Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California" Results 61 - 80 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
United States 16-309 Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
California (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 621, 628.), an employer communicating to his or her employees (Dealie v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Most other States have experienced unacceptably long processing and adjudication delays. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
Full text of the executive order First-Ever Mandatory Water Reductions for Urban and Agriculture Across California <> EPA Proposes Pretreatment Standards for Unconventional Oil and Gas Wastewater - EPA has proposed pretreatment standards that would require zero discharge of pollutants from unconventional oil and natural gas extraction facilities into… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Because class actions are out of control in California, there are lots more ascertainability cases in Ninth Circuit district courts that we haven't cited. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:38 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm by Cicely Wilson
P., United States Supreme Court (4/29/14)Environmental Law, Government & Administrative LawThe Clean Air Act (CAA) requires national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for pollutants at levels that will protect public health, 42 U.S.C. 7408. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]