Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California" Results 81 - 100 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2008, 4:56 pm
Several bills have been introduced and various committees have held periodic hearings, but no legislation has been adopted by the United States Congress. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department announced that Plains All American Pipeline and several of its operating subsidiaries have agreed to spend approximately $41 million to upgrade 10,420 miles of crude oil pipeline operated in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the district court erred in using the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Standard Oil Co. of La. (1929) (holding nonseverable statutory provisions that did not burden the parties). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Pace Law School Library
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law.  7 Tex. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
— Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, November 30, 2009 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Mobil Oil Co., 866 F.2d 1149, 1155 (9th Cir. 1989) (following Associated General Contractors formulation); Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]