Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California" Results 101 - 120 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
United States 16-309 Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department announced that Plains All American Pipeline and several of its operating subsidiaries have agreed to spend approximately $41 million to upgrade 10,420 miles of crude oil pipeline operated in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the district court erred in using the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
On appeal, plaintiff argued that the district court did not correctly apply the plausibility standard under the DTSA. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Pace Law School Library
  Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Standard Oil Co. of La. (1929) (holding nonseverable statutory provisions that did not burden the parties). [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, July 2, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle,Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
: Duhn Oil Tool, Inc v Cooper Cameron Corp (not precedential) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses ITC finding of non-infringement of design patent: Crocs, Inc v ITC (Inventive Step) (ITC Law Blog) (Class 99) (IP Frontline) CAFC: Visiting Judge explains potential downfalls of De Novo standard of claim construction review: Trading Techs. [read post]