Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Co. of California"
Results 101 - 120
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The 10 issues to watch are: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Special Issue, 2011, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 11-54Catherine Fisk and Erwin Chemerinsky Duke University School of Law and University of California, Irvine School of Law , Duke University - School of Law , University of California, Irvine School of Law Abstract: In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
http://j.st/GqZ United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
Goldman, Sachs & Co. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
At issue was whether the district court erred in using the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
(Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:51 pm
The Plaintiffs sued Occidental (among the largest oil and gas companies in the U.S.) for environmental damage arising from alleged use of out-of-date methods for separating crude oil that contravened United States and Peruvian law, which allegedly resulted in millions of gallons of toxic oil byproducts in waterways. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
The origins of forum non conveniens In 1947 the Supreme Court decided Gulf Oil Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
The origins of forum non conveniens In 1947 the Supreme Court decided Gulf Oil Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
The state courts of California, like many states, held that these sorts of contract provisions were unconscionable as applied to class actions. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Abilene Cotton Oil Co., 204 U. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:30 pm
See Steele Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:43 pm
Shell Oil Co., 2011 WL 1522377 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Cooper Technologies Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
