Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Company" Results 221 - 240 of 511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 9:02 am by Abby Meyer
This bill would amend the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to define “natural” with a certain set of standards. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
Thus, if the SEC regulated misleading ESG disclosures, such action would likely be protected under this standard, but states retaliating against banks with any form of ESG screening likely would not. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
The Baltimore billboard companies seek Supreme Court review in Clear Channel Outdoor, LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act is proof that compromise is still possible in the halls of the United States Congress and that Washington can still work for manufacturers and citizens across the country. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department announced that Plains All American Pipeline and several of its operating subsidiaries have agreed to spend approximately $41 million to upgrade 10,420 miles of crude oil pipeline operated in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 17 April 2018 Warby J heard the judicial review case, The Queen on the application of Coulter v Independent Press Standards Organisation. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:54 am by Gabe Johnson-Karp
  Perhaps the most notable advocate of such a system in the United States was Justice William O. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Alexander Gibson
The reasoning being that standard-form contracts are signed by consumers who have no right to negotiate its terms. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 10:17 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
That standard was most recent reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in MedImmune v Genentech, which stated: [Our cases] do not draw the brightest of lines between those declaratory-judgment actions that satisfy the case-or-controversy requirement and those that do not. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by Steve Davies
  The government has leased most of its mineral resources, including most of the Pinedale Field, to oil and gas companies (the Operators). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]