Search for: "United States v. Stanley" Results 1 - 20 of 499
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
A USCIS officer could no longer deny L-1A classification to such a manager because they were not supported by personnel within the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:06 pm by Ben Vernia
”The False Claims Act imposes treble damages and penalties on those who knowingly and falsely claim money from the United States or knowingly fail to pay money owed to the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
(Fn. 2: Moab and the United States spill much ink fighting the question presented, insisting that this case is about half-truths rather than pure omissions. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
He left the bulk of his estate to the United States.[2] He never explained what he expected the United States to do with the money, which was then the largest unrestricted gift ever made to the federal government.[3] “Taxes are the price we pay for civilized society,” he’d once written in a famous dissent.[4] Was the bequest a kind of tax he felt he owed the country? [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Morgan Stanley split from the Ninth Circuit, finding that a violation of Item 303 would be actionable under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 if plaintiffs met the materiality requirements set forth in Basic Inc. v. [read post]