Search for: "United States v. Stanley" Results 221 - 240 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2007, 1:09 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeFraud Convict Denied Bail Pending Appeal; Burdens of Proof on Claims Not Met United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
While the Supreme Court has not retreated from the core holding in Ferber, it has made shutting down the marketplace more difficult with its child pornography holdings in a series of cases, including United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:06 pm
United States, which allowed a company to be held criminally liable any time an employee commits a crime intended to help the company. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:53 am by Kevin
  Here's the first sentence from Dockery v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
 Home Depot removed their separate action to the federal court, but United States District Judge Stanley Chesler granted their motion to remand and the matter was remanded to state court.Raspa’s case was also removed to federal court on the basis of diversity between the parties stating that “it was likely, that the amount in controversy exceeded the sum of $75,000.00”. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
 Home Depot removed their separate action to the federal court, but United States District Judge Stanley Chesler granted their motion to remand and the matter was remanded to state court.Raspa’s case was also removed to federal court on the basis of diversity between the parties stating that “it was likely, that the amount in controversy exceeded the sum of $75,000.00”. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am by SHG
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Hollnagel and BCI Aircraft Leasing, Inc.Case Number: 07-cv-04538 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois)Case filed: August 13, 2007Qualifying judgment/order: December 18, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-2 In the Matter of Morgan Stanley & Co. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:33 pm by Michael Helfand
The Amendment itself reads, in part, "The Courts . . . when exercising their judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Code, federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, established common law, the Oklahoma Statutes and rules promulgated pursuant thereto, and if necessary the law of another state of the United States provided the law of the other state does not include Sharia Law, in… [read post]