Search for: "United States v. Stanley" Results 241 - 260 of 545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Jason Stanley argues that last week’s argument in an immigration case, Maslenjak v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
When parties have gone outside the boundaries that the state has set, it makes sense that the state would treat the impermissible act as if it never occurred. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant before acquiring cell-site-location information from wireless carriers, that “question the factual and legal assumptions of the pro-Carpenter briefs. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:56 am by Bexis
  The not-so-good case, which just turned up the other day, is Stanley v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:04 am
The court said that the Eleventh Amendment provides that: The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens of any Foreign State. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
 In this memo, Practice Center Contributor Stan Keller discusses what might happen now: With the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit having struck down Rule 14a-11 in Business Roundtable et al v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:57 am by Lorelie S. Masters
However, as in civil procedure applicable in the United States, parties may move to compel disclosure if the opposing party refuses or fails to produce documents. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:06 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412, 421-23 (1988) (refusing a cause of action of social security complaints); United States v. [read post]