Search for: "United States v. Stanley" Results 301 - 320 of 548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 12:20 am by Karwan Eskerie
Reference was also made to Keenan v United Kingdom (2001) 33 EHRR 38, where inadequate medical records, lack of recourse to specialist psychiatric input, segregation and punishment were found to amount to degrading treatment in respect of a mentally ill person. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
” Additionally, when restrictive immigration laws in the 1920s closed the doors to Europe, the Mexican Revolution initiated the first large-scale immigration of Latinos across the border into the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:26 pm by David Ettinger
On May 1, 2, and 3, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): United Teachers of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
    So, do you remember the article I posted the other day about accounting for a pool of loans and how values are based on assumptions about the performance of the pool into the future? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:16 am by Rosalind English
Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department March 29 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has allowed the suspected terrorist Al? [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:16 pm by Vincent E. McGeary
The dissent argued that the certified order from the Court of Federal Claims did not confer appellate jurisdiction over the earlier dismissal of infringement claims against the United States, citing United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am by William McGrath
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:01 pm by Matthew Nelson
Peck, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of New York, issued an opinion and order (order) on February 24th in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]