Search for: "United States v. Stansfield"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
First, “the public accusations by Van Liew that Stansfield was ‘corrupt and a liar’” were fully protected speech: These remarks about a local public official constituted political speech and were at the core of the speech that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
See also United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 2:54 pm
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Foundation, United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Case no. 6:09-cv-1229-Orl-31GJK. [read post]
