Search for: "United States v. Starks"
Results 41 - 60
of 820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2017, 4:43 pm
”See Shinseki v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
* * *In this case, the United States alleged that, from 2007 to 2020, under the direction and control of its prior management, R&V Associates Ltd. and Ronald Violi, Wheeling Hospital systematically violated the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute by knowingly and willfully paying improper compensation to referring physicians that was based on the volume or value of the physicians’ referrals or was above fair market value [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:26 pm
Stark in Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 9:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:31 pm
In Hirst v. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 10:52 am
Stark in Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:30 pm
Wilson, that the law was not inconsistent with the United States Supreme Court holding in Coker v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 7:16 am
RodrigueIn June, 2007, the United State Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by a physician association, alleging that the “fair market value safe harbor” under the federal Stark law developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) is invalid because it was implemented without following proper procedure. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December in In Re United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:18 am
In a stinging rebuke to recent Supreme Court decisions that demonstrate an implicit faith in arbitration, United States District Judge Max O. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Kris Miccio Adam Cohen has written an exhaustive account of the nexus between eugenics, racism and immigration law in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:46 am
In Broca v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
These stark realities are met by the suggestion that it is lawful to compel an American citizen to submit to illegal imprisonment on the assumption that he might, after going to the Assembly Center, apply for his discharge by suing out a writ of habeas corpus, as was done in the Endo case, supra. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm
These stark realities are met by the suggestion that it is lawful to compel an American citizen to submit to illegal imprisonment on the assumption that he might, after going to the Assembly Center, apply for his discharge by suing out a writ of habeas corpus, as was done in the Endo case, supra. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
These stark realities are met by the suggestion that it is lawful to compel an American citizen to submit to illegal imprisonment on the assumption that he might, after going to the Assembly Center, apply for his discharge by suing out a writ of habeas corpus, as was done in the Endo case, supra. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 9:05 am
United States of America, Case No. 12.626. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 10:08 am
From Thaler v. [read post]
