Search for: "United States v. State Water Resources Control Bd. (1986)" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Around the same time, the Regional Water Quality Control Board took interest in the site due to downstream stream contamination, potentially as a result of runoff from the horse and cattle facilities. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
  By the end of the opinion what emerges clearly are the convictions at data is never neutral, but is instead the expression of politics which is for Congress to control, and that transparency is not a primary premise of the gathering of information that is the Census. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
At some point UTSW began experiencing water penetration in the building's concrete foundation and installed ceramic floor tiles because of the moisture problems. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]