Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,412
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2024, 1:33 pm
District Court for the District of South Carolina (“MDL”) and other recent lawsuits. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 12:30 pm
So this week, IJ filed a petition in the South Carolina Supreme Court, arguing that the new policy falls afoul of two bedrock, towering, and monumental U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 11:23 am
The Ocean Wind 1 and 2 project cancellations also followed the filing of County of Cape May v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 6:20 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 1:07 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
South Carolina (1963) found that the Constitution forbids state officials from forcing a crowd to disperse when legally marching for civil rights at the state house. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 10:26 pm
As of August 28, a total of 59 people infected with the outbreak strain of Listeria have been reported from 19 states – Including: Arizona 1, Florida 3, Georgia 2, Illinois 1, Indiana 1, Louisiana 1, Maryland 8, Massachusetts 3, Minnesota 1, Missouri 3, New Jersey 5, New Mexico 1, New York 17, North Carolina 1, Pennsylvania 2, South Carolina 2, Tennessee 1, Virginia 4, and Wisconsin 1. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 6:50 am
This judgment accords a long line in judgments across the United States of America including in the high courts of Delaware, Connecticut, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Washington, Wisconsin, New Jersey, New York, California, Maryland and Columbia where the courts have all found in favour of the insurers on this issue. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 7:00 pm
” The majority of cases uncovered in Pregnancy as a Crime took place in states that have enshrined fetal personhood in their civil and criminal laws, such as Alabama (104 cases), Oklahoma (68 cases), and South Carolina (10 cases). [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
South Carolina – Ambiguous Severance Agreement Muddies Clear Valuati [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
For those who haven’t looked at that Amendment recently, its words provide, quite straightforwardly, that, for citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen, the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age” (emphasis added).Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas grant absentee-voting eligibility specifically for all voters sixty-five or… [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 7:34 am
Plaintiffs in this case are sixteen (16) states (Louisiana, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming) who jointly filed to challenge the Biden Administration’s LNG export ban to countries without a free trade agreement (“non-FTA countries”) in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), Congressional Review Act, and the… [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 5:51 am
[ii] Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Utah, Wisconsin, Virgin Islands. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 10:43 am
SHUCHA, UW Law School, Amber Madole, University of Southern California Gould School of Law, and Rebecca Plevel, University of South Carolina- Joseph F. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am
Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:49 am
In one case, on July 31, 2024, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an injunction blocking the Title IX rule from going into effect in Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, and Georgia. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 7:24 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), by depriving the property of all economically viable use. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Two months earlier, the French counsel in Charleston, Jean-Baptiste Perry, had sent a letter to the French Minister of Marine which described the “anguish” of South Carolina planters over the prospect that after 1808 the United States might not only “prohibit the importation of negroes,” but also “emancipate those born in this country after that time” (27 DHRC 41). [read post]