Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
(I'm not taking a position on the controversial question of statehood here), Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah (submitter), Vermont, and Washington.All of the most populous states except California--which might… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
A federal district court in South Carolina has invalidated the NLRB's rule requiring employers to post notice in the workplace informing employees of their NLRA rights (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, April 13, 2012, Norton, D). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 12:09 pm
During the pendency of that appeal the Supreme Court of the United States decided Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am
In the amicus brief, which was filed with the United States Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:01 pm
The damages and penalties against Tuomey totaled $237,454,195 as decided in United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Given the statute doesn’t require the states to affirmatively do anything, one could argue that § 1373 resembles not the federal schemes struck down in Printz and New York but rather the statutes upheld in South Carolina v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:50 am
The South Carolina Court of Appeals' recent decision in Smith v. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:50 am
The South Carolina Court of Appeals' recent decision in Smith v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
It's about the people of South Carolina. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 1:23 pm
We show that, relative to the rest of the United States, South Carolina suffered no statistically significant increase in crime rates. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:13 am
Years ago this platform discussed at some length how more than one United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decision has considered the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Bazzle: in the context of who decides issues of arbitrability, as well as whether arbitration agreements allow classwide arbitration. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 9:14 pm
No one has been executed in the United States for a crime other than murder since 1964. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:42 pm
Exhibit D is described as “a heavily redacted transcript of testimony from an apparently completely public criminal proceeding in South Carolina. [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:44 am
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North and South Carolina) affirmed the bankruptcy court’s decision to dismiss the debtors’ Chapter 7 case based on the totality of the circumstances under 11 U.S.C. [read post]
12 May 2017, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:17 am
Brief of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of Respondents Brief of the States of Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and Wyoming Brief of the United States Brief of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
At approximately 3:44 p.m. that day the South Carolina Supreme Court issued its decision in Crossmann Communities v. [read post]
