Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina" Results 241 - 260 of 1,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm by Shea Denning
Third, the United States Supreme Court winds up its term, invariably deciding significant criminal law cases the very week of the conference. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:16 am by Gregory Forman
Finally, the United States code section regarding personal jurisdiction for dividing military retirement overrides South Carolina’s long-arm statute. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
  In South Carolina v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:10 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
” Trial Judge’s Ex Parte Communication with Jurors Causes Conviction Reversal The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Shaw v Reno As a result of the 1990 census, North Carolina became entitled to a 12th seat in the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  South Carolina in 1832 issued a proclamation nullifying protective tariffs. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
Padilla refiled his habeas petition in South Carolina and the Fourth Circuit ultimately upheld his detention. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:40 am by Kent Scheidegger
Senator John Chafee of Rhode Island named his son Lincoln, but maybe he should have named him Calhoun, after the South Carolina leader who believed states could nullify federal laws. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:30 am by Jeffrey Brown
Over the next week, Cybercrime Review will feature a series of posts that takes a look at how federal and state courts are applying the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]