Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
In Shak v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:52 pm
In a contrary ruling, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (embracing federal courts located in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina) held that the DOL’s waiver regulations prohibited all FMLA settlements without supervision from the DOL or without court approval. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 am
Thomas School of Law) has posted Judicial Modesty and Abortion (South Carolina Law Review, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Two months earlier, the French counsel in Charleston, Jean-Baptiste Perry, had sent a letter to the French Minister of Marine which described the “anguish” of South Carolina planters over the prospect that after 1808 the United States might not only “prohibit the importation of negroes,” but also “emancipate those born in this country after that time” (27 DHRC 41). [read post]
St. Francis Health System, Inc. pays $36.5 million to settle False Claims Act and Anti-kickback case
16 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
Boroughs for the District of South Carolina. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
Last week, the petitioners filed their merits brief in Sackett v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:25 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 3:53 am
In 1967, the United States Supreme Court decision in Loving v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
The first, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 12:07 pm
An appeal of a verdict rendered in federal court in South Carolina would be reviewed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which is located in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm
Since the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
Teeter, 759 S.E.2d 144 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina May 2014). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
United States, a case which presents difficult issues regarding law enforcement access to cell site location information. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:12 pm
On February 7, 2011, the South Carolina Supreme Court publicly reprimanded J. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
Belohlavek (University of South Florida, Tampa) reviews Louis P. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:38 am
The NLRB can also appeal the issue to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
It is not often that the United States Supreme Court hears a family law case, so the Court's June, 2011, ruling in Turner v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
United States, 543 F.3d 129 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
