Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:04 am
V. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:28 am
Phipps wrote that in Auld v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 623 (1984) ("Freedom of association ... plainly presupposes a freedom not to associate. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm
The insurance company filed a motion for summary judgment, which the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Orangeburg denied. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm
The insurance company filed a motion for summary judgment, which the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Orangeburg denied. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
In 2005, Husband closed a successful business in New York State and relocated to South Carolina to advance Wife’s career with United States Customs and Border Protection. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:23 am
A lawsuit was filed Friday by Americans United for Separation of Church and State on behalf of a Catholic woman challenging actions by the federal government and the state of South Carolina that permit foster-care placement agencies to use religious criteria for approval of foster care families. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 6:33 am
Supreme Court addressed the case of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
The reason the South Carolina (or the Texas) federal court will stay the action as filed is so that the state court action, which began earlier, may finish first. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Goodale, the plaintiff was an insurance company that filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia against its insured, the insured’s son, and a woman who was injured in a golf cart accident that allegedly occurred while the insured’s son was driving under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
Goodale, the plaintiff was an insurance company that filed a declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia against its insured, the insured’s son, and a woman who was injured in a golf cart accident that allegedly occurred while the insured’s son was driving under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
It should be noted that South Carolina has not adopted the Daubert test and instead follows its own test set forth in State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 4:19 am
United States (2012), the Supreme... [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:55 am
A South Carolina federal district court has issued a preliminary injunction barring the state of South Carolina from further advertising, distribution or production of its controversial "I Believe" license plate. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
