Search for: "United States v. State of South Carolina"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
United States, C.A. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm
The April 12, 2023, Court of Appeals opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
“After the judge makes a determination as to damages, we will consider our options,” Panico said in his statement.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:24 am
Neither South Carolina nor West Virginia are thought of as progressive states. [read post]
Leiba v. Holder: Aggravated felony bar in INA 212(h) inapplicable to those who were never “admitted”
3 Dec 2012, 6:01 am
Said case is controlling in the states of Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia but can be used as a persuasive authority throughout the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:24 pm
In a recent opinion, United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:56 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
Leiba v. Holder: Aggravated felony bar in INA 212(h) inapplicable to those who were never “admitted”
3 Dec 2012, 6:01 am
Said case is controlling in the states of Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia but can be used as a persuasive authority throughout the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
Jones, an 1872 decision by the United States Supreme Court that, among other irrelevant observations (called "obiter dicta", or "things said beside the point"), offered the view that the then-established Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America was hierarchical. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
The deputation issued the following statement:Due to the actions of General Convention, the South Carolina Deputation has concluded that we cannot continue with business as usual. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:58 am
Rodgers, 131 S.Ct. 2507 (2011), the United States Supreme Court found South Carolina’s methods for support enforcement violated due process. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:19 am
A long line of United States Supreme Court cases interpreting the liberty provision of the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution shield fit parents from the state intruding upon their parental decision making. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:01 am
But most unforgivably, Judge Waring opened the all-white Democratic Primary in South Carolina to blacks with his ruling in Elmore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 3:18 am
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina recently had occasion to apply the test in Power Beverages v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 2:10 pm
See e.g, Tranzact Techs., Inc. v. 1Source Worldsite, 406 F.3d 851 (7th Cir. 2005); United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 11:22 am
Bostic, 135 S.Ct. 286 (2014), the United States Supreme Court denied Virginia’s petition for certiorari in Bostic v. [read post]
