Search for: "United States v. Stewart" Results 261 - 280 of 882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Katherine Stewart argues that “[i]f the Senate confirms Brett Kavanaugh, it will be declaring that the United States is a nation in which one brand of religion enjoys a place of privilege; that we are a nation of laws — except in cases where the law offends those who subscribe to our preferred religion; and that we recognize the dignity of all people unless they belong to specific groups our national religion views… [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Carolyn Shapiro is associate professor of law and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Both the federal trial and appellate cases in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
” Rulings IPSO has published two resolution statements and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 02597-18 Stewart v express.co.uk, resolved directly with publication Resolution Statement 02287-18 Jolley v Daily Record, resolved via IPSO mediation 19325-17 A woman v Dover Express, no breach after investigation 02514-18 Rochdale Borough Council v Rochdale Online, no breach after investigation 02623-18 Templeman… [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Petitioner Mark Janus is a state employee whose unit is represented by a public-sector union (Union), one of the respondents. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The bill broke with tradition in Britain and the empire, as it included provisions from the bill of rights of the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Matthew Forys
The Supreme Court upheld the free speech rights of state and local public-sector workers in Janus v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a case about whether employee stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
Carpenter’s attorneys argue modern cellphone records are fundamentally different than phones used in 1979 and that a more recent Court decision from 2012, United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a case about tribal fishing rights, the judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided court. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:12 am by Sandy Levinson
Is it unconstitutional for Congress to criminalize tax evasion (or even more certainly, lying to an F.B.I. agent as was done by Martha Stewart)? [read post]