Search for: "United States v. Stone" Results 221 - 240 of 1,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
In the Court of Appeal Moses LJ, with whom Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR and Sullivan LJ agreed, concluded that the discrimination was indirect rather than direct. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm by Giorgio Luceri
Background and analysis of the Judgment are provided by Comparative Patent Remedies.In the United States, there is a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:45 am
Interestingly though, the Internal Revenue Service found recourse not in the Internal Revenue Code, but under Title 31 of the United States Code in Tyler. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:23 pm
Roberts Jr., the chief justice of the United States, put a song lyric where the citation to precedent usually goes. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am by Dan Gauss
  The persistent underfunding of indigent defense systems in the United States for the last 50 years has occurred on the watch of our state courts and our profession. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:40 am by Jay Willis
United States, in which he criticized the Department of Justice for failing to recommend that prisoners such as Dillon be pardoned. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:11 am by Robert Percival
He argued that the United States had a legitimate reason to use the CWA instead of CERCLA in an effort to “kill two birds with one stone. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am by azatty
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]