Search for: "United States v. Strang"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Whereas Warren Court activism was generally in the service of democracy, some of the most egregious Roberts Court decisions--gutting the Voting Rights Act, invalidating bipartisan campaign finance regulation, rendering challenges to partisan gerrymandering impossible, and much more--seem designed to make government in the United States less democratic. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
Some scholars assume that the President holds an "Office under the United States. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
EPA, the Court wiped out federal protections under the Clean Water Act for as much as half of the remaining wetlands in the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:21 am
United States. 295 U.S. 495 (1935). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Without that grammar, the past becomes suddenly strange and unfamiliar. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:39 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
The founding generation was also worried about two other kinds of military threat – armed insurrection against state governments from within or, strange though it may seem to us now, invasions of one state by another state or confederation of states. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
Itself a prolific issuer of guidance documents, the United States filed an amicus curiae brief in support of neither party. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
I understand and appreciate that, on the high seas, the United States can exercise jurisdiction over "stateless" vessels. [read post]
