Search for: "United States v. Strong" Results 121 - 140 of 7,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 11:17 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
We often lament “the vanishing trial” in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:39 am by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from State of NEW JERSEY, Department of Treasury, Division of Investment, o/b/o Common Pension Fund A v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
The application for the FISC order was personally approved by John Ashcroft, then the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by Kathryn Briuglio
, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced by the clause. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by Kathryn Bruiglio
, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced by the clause. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:06 am
United States, the Court waded into the thorny question of the scope of insider trading liability. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:36 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Arkansas Valley Adventures, January 6, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, opined the court, “an award will not be overturned unless the award violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power” and that the grounds for vacating an arbitration award are narrowly construed.With respect to vacating an arbitration award on the grounds that it violates strong public policy, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Reddy v Schaffer, 123 AD3d 935,… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, opined the court, “an award will not be overturned unless the award violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power” and that the grounds for vacating an arbitration award are narrowly construed.With respect to vacating an arbitration award on the grounds that it violates strong public policy, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Reddy v Schaffer, 123 AD3d 935,… [read post]