Search for: "United States v. Stuart" Results 181 - 200 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713(1971) (Stewart, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Zabic indicates that a Verizon employee, Joshua Stuart, `provided Ms. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
Il commence ainsi un duel judiciaire, dans lequel ce qui compte ne sont pas les faits, mais leur interprétation et lacapacité des deux avocats.Ce sera la justicequi gagnera ou bine l'habileté dans la manipulation des évènements? [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:42 pm
See In re United States, No. 14–70486, 2015 WL 3938190, at *8 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Stuart Goldstein and Jeffrey Pikus each own 50% of the LLC’s Class A voting membership interests. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm by Schachtman
Women’s rights groups all over the United States applauded what I did. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
"); 554 US at 625 ("We therefore read [United States v] Miller [, 307 US 174 (1939),] to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapon not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:38 am by Amy Howe
In an interview at the blog of the Harvard Law and Policy Review, Virginia Solicitor General Stuart Raphael discusses the amicus brief that his state filed in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Kishore Mahbubani, Singapore’s former ambassador to the United Nations, argues that the city-state is at an “inflection point” . [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Jeff Gittins
Stuart AdamsThe second substitute of SB281 passed on the last day of the legislative session. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
The majority opinion in the state court, issued unsigned but in the name of the court (“per curiam”), sought to refute every argument made for same-sex marriage as a constitutional matter  and lambasted the Supreme Court for making a “moral judgment, not a legal judgment” when it struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]