Search for: "United States v. Stuart" Results 301 - 320 of 437
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 6:42 am by Tejinder Singh
After the Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In other words, the state prisoner must give the state courts an opportunity to act on his claims before he presents those claims to a federal court in a habeas petition.Interpreting this exhaustion requirement, the United States Supreme Court in O’Sullivan v Boerckel (526 U.S. 838 [1999]) held that a prisoner who fails to present his claims in a petition for discretionary review to a state court of last resort has not properly presented his… [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In other words, the state prisoner must give the state courts an opportunity to act on his claims before he presents those claims to a federal court in a habeas petition.Interpreting this exhaustion requirement, the United States Supreme Court in O’Sullivan v Boerckel (526 U.S. 838 [1999]) held that a prisoner who fails to present his claims in a petition for discretionary review to a state court of last resort has not properly presented… [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am by Roshonda Scipio
[Mechanicsburg, Pa.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2011.KFP81 .P4 NO.6942PropertyAmerican property : a history of how, why, and what we own / Stuart Banner.Banner, Stuart, 1963-Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press, 2011.KF562 .B36 2011PropertyReappraisals in the law of property / by John V. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:58 pm by Lawrence Solum
  In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 9:20 am by Dwight Sullivan
  NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by New Books Script
[Toronto, Ont. : Magistrates' Courts], 1965 KF 224 B568 B53 1965 V.4 Regina vs. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:47 am by Steve Hall
It provides a thorough, science-based explanation of how eyewitness evidence can become tainted and offers a judicious template for the United States Supreme Court and other states to follow. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:09 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Keenan, Regulating Information Flows, Regulating Conflict: An Analysis of United States Conflict Minerals LegislationMoshik Lavie & Christophe Muller, Incentives and Survival in Violent ConflictsAnnyssa Bellal & Stuart Casey-Maslen, Enhancing Compliance with International Law by Armed Non-State ActorsAlexander Kees, Regulation of Private Military CompaniesAlice Gadler, Armed Forces as Carrying both the Stick and the Carrot? [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:54 pm by David Zaring
Earlier, we asked whether fixing costs in a European sport that is broadcast in the United States might run afoul of American antitrust law. [read post]