Search for: "United States v. Sugar Institute" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am by Schachtman
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:39 pm by Mark Walsh
” The argument continues with the justices much less testy with each other than they were on Tuesday, during National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Writing for the Brookings Institution, Lisa V. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Story was confirmed by the United States Senate, and received his commission on November 18, 1811. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm by Nursing Home Law Center LLC
Jump to: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W A Back to top Acute care – A high level of care provided to a patient for a medical condition or illness that a patient is likely to recover from. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
  A: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ____ Q: What is the subject matter of 17 USC 119? [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Today's court ruling should be a wake-up call for the United States Senate to do its job, hold hearings on RFS2, and address the adverse impacts of this unrealistic program. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am by Richard A. Epstein
  From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
Lawcast 203:  Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London  who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by Rumpole
The big legal question these days is whether the United States Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]