Search for: "United States v. Sutton" Results 261 - 280 of 286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
These include the preamble to the Constitution Act, 1867 (“a Constitution similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom”), at least by inference if not explicitly (see, for example, Quong Wing v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
" (Recommendation p. 10).If that is what the Ethics Council is suggesting, it presents an interesting and useful application of the 2nd Pillar of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (corporate responsibility to respect human rights) to enterprises independent of their legal obligations under the more formally legal 2st Pillar state duty to protect human rights. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:22 pm by Neil Cahn
She arrived in the United States in 1981, at the age of twenty-one. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:09 am by Calvin TerBeek
But Alito then weighs in on the "culture wars," criticizing the Court's handling of Fisher v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin Russell
Elite Logistics, Inc., in 2007, the 10th Circuit sat en banc to review discrimination claims by an employee who alleged that his employer suspended him from work until he produced documentation of his right to work in the United States, and then fired him after he produced the documentation and demanded an apology. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
  Rule 16.5  concerns defences, and states that a defendant must state which allegations he admits, denies, and is unable to admit or deny and requires the claimant to prove (a non-admission). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Jag
  Rule 16.5  concerns defences, and states that a defendant must state which allegations he admits, denies, and is unable to admit or deny and requires the claimant to prove (a non-admission). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming the fee award, a Sixth Circuit panel explained that accepting the lower offer was one measure of success (or lack thereof), that Rule 68 did not conflict with the fee-shifting statute at issue, and that the reduction was reasonable (McKelvey v Secretary of United States Army, September 18, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
”  One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]