Search for: "United States v. Sutton" Results 261 - 280 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
But as Judge Jeffrey Sutton concisely put the point in his careful and exhaustive concurring opinion upholding the Act in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by Abbe R. Gluck and Gillian Metzger
The “tangible link to commerce … based on empirical demonstration” that Justice Kennedy identified as necessary under the Commerce Clause two Terms ago in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
I stand by my initial reaction to that decision, and especially the pivotal concurrence by Bush-appointed Judge Jeffrey Sutton, as well as the longer critique I published ten days later. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:57 am by Lyle Denniston
Lopez in 1995 and United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:57 am by Tony Mauro
Sutton's opinion has been viewed as especially important because he is a respected conservative judge who, as appellate lawyer, often argued in favor of state sovereignty. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
* The test used by Woodbridge for this evaluation was discontinue as the company had concerns as to its reliability. ** In Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc., 527 US 471, the Supreme Court suggested, but did not specifically hold, that working was a major life activity *** Relying on Mathews' physician's statement, the Post did not allow Mathews to work during this period. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
Sutton & Sons, Inc (Property, intangible) District Court N D Illinois: Infringement claims against corporate officers require active participation: Free Green Can, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:01 pm
So consider last year's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by Orin Kerr
§ 228 (childsupport payments); see also United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
   In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales  [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]