Search for: "United States v. Sutton"
Results 101 - 120
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Also significant is the Sixth Circuit’s correct understanding of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:24 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Amanda Hollis-Brusky argues that, although the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Sutton) & Richard L. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am
United States, the Court will consider whether to uphold a Pennsylvania man’s criminal conviction for threatening statements made on Facebook. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:09 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Texas; United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
United States, in which Justice Antonin Scalia issued a statement regarding the denial. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
United States, 272 U.S. 52, 110–39 (1926) (executive power); INS v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
United States (Redux). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:12 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
For reasons that I am too lazy to look up, the decision that the Supreme Court overturned is not from a Circuit Court of Appeals but from a panel of one judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and two from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am
Commentary on Wednesday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
And United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:14 pm
In DeBoer v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:50 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
By Matthew Skurnik Since the Supreme Court’s June 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Affirming the fee award, a Sixth Circuit panel explained that accepting the lower offer was one measure of success (or lack thereof), that Rule 68 did not conflict with the fee-shifting statute at issue, and that the reduction was reasonable (McKelvey v Secretary of United States Army, September 18, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:57 pm
Further, the the Supreme Court of United States declined hearing the case, because the court determined that such a law did not violate the federal Commerce Clause. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
United States, 134 S. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
