Search for: "United States v. Sutton"
Results 121 - 140
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
For reasons that I am too lazy to look up, the decision that the Supreme Court overturned is not from a Circuit Court of Appeals but from a panel of one judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and two from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:15 am
Because this issue will be resolved entirely on the basis of state law, an appeal to the United States Supreme Court will not be possible. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 3:41 am
To establish priority, Petitioner Kennedy had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it owns proprietary rights in "a mark or trade name previously used in the United States . . . and not abandoned . . . . [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:05 pm
United States, 132 S. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
United States, 588 U. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:35 am
Garrett or Sutton v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:52 pm
United States, 306 F.3d 938, 947-48 (9th Cir. 2002); and Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:00 pm
Because the issue was not before them neither the majority opinion nor the dissent mentioned Sutton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 7:36 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
While the criminal charges were dismissed due to the crimes being time-barred, the prosecutor still requested the Pesaro judge to issue a confiscation order for the bronze, based on Italian cultural heritage law.[14] While the Getty Trust opposed this order, in 2019 the Court of Cassation confirmed it, thus making it final under Italian law.[15] Legal Issues and the ECtHR Judgement In order to obtain the actual return of the statue, the Pesaro prosecutor had to seek the recognition and enforcement… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:22 am
United Air Lines, Inc., and Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:02 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
Forest Serv., 803 F.3d 809, 815–17 (6th Cir. 2015) (Sutton, J.) [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
Supreme Court decisions, Sutton v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:57 am
Lopez in 1995 and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
See Thomas More Law Center, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am
Commentary on Wednesday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
