Search for: "United States v. Sutton"
Results 141 - 160
of 270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2021, 4:29 am
Judge Sutton matter-of-factly asserts that this is a case of first impression because “[t]he United States Supreme Court has never considered an anti-eugenics statute before. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:43 pm
Williams held that the en banc Sixth Circuit had already held in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:52 am
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:23 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKGovernmentAdvocacy Group Can Use False Claims Act to Challenge County's Certification That It Furthered Fair Housing United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:30 am
One involved cases following Sutton v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the practice in California Forestry Assn. v. [read post]
Healthcare and Federalism: Should courts strictly scrutinize federal regulation of medical services?
14 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Moreover, the distinction is not even very crisp, as Judge Sutton's concurring opinion in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
As the Founding-era Supreme Court held in McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger). [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:57 am
Sutton (in support of petitioners) Docket: 08-1085 Title: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
According to Sixth Circuit, the man-woman marriage laws in these states did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment—even in the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:01 pm
"Earlier coverage of Harbison v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:56 pm
The United States was created as a government of the people and government's role is limited at best. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 11:50 am
The panel of Chief Judge Boggs and Judges Moore, and Sutton issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
As Judge Sutton wrote in concurrence in Mitts: “Sometimes there is nothing wrong with letting the United States Supreme Court decide whether a decision is correct and, if not, whether it is worthy of correction. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
And United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm
When the union fell apart, Monasky took A.M.T., their two-month-old daughter, from Italy to the United States. [read post]
