Search for: "United States v. Sutton" Results 141 - 160 of 278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
Poverty can be grim and corrosive, and social mobility in the United States is not what it used to be. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am by Kathy Kapusta
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court stated that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court wrote that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:46 am by Steve Delchin
  As Judge Sutton wrote in concurrence in Mitts: “Sometimes there is nothing wrong with letting the United States Supreme Court decide whether a decision is correct and, if not, whether it is worthy of correction. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
United States (No. 96-8986), in which the Court appointed now-Judge Jeff Sutton.) [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Second, the case itself (apart from the issues on appeal) demonstrates the increasing specter of criminal liability in cases of trade secrets theft - particularly when the theft is intended to benefit companies outside the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm by Marty Lederman
United States, in which the Court appointed Jeffrey Sutton as an amicus to argue that the Court lacked (statutory) jurisdiction, since both the United States and the petitioner-defendant agreed that the Court had jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:52 pm by Bexis
United States, 306 F.3d 938, 947-48 (9th Cir. 2002); and Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
A discussion of the R.P. and others v United Kingdom case (see above). [read post]