Search for: "United States v. Swan"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Even though it was never legally established that Swan’s bulbs infringed on Edison’s patents, the shadow of IP law made it too risky for Swan to continue competing. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
In the United States, the courts have been highly reluctant to award emotional damages for death or injury of a pet. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Under the existing campaign laws, as reaffirmed by Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:07 am
Department of Labor’s tests for determining this issue In Glatt v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 9:21 am
In Glatt v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 8:55 am
Friends of the Wild Swan v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:58 am
Friends of the Wild Swan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:06 pm
In Friends of the Wild Swan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 11:14 am
The Canadian court held that risk sufficed, and it went further, contrary to the majority of courts in the United States, to hold that a 40% reduction in risk sufficed to satisfy the more-likely-than-not standard. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:07 am
v=SY9PoR7-XGA.) [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:57 pm
Allen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm
Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc., 11 Civ 6784 (WHP) United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:40 am
Last week, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York agreed. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:40 am
Glatt, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Boerne v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
