Search for: "United States v. Sweet" Results 81 - 100 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am by Andrea Shannon (US)
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am by Andrea Shannon (US)
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
The operative portion of Senator Specter's bill is short and sweet: Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by Eric
If SOPA had passed, undoubtedly we would have seen an increase in enforcement actions between two foreign litigants without real ties to the United States. [read post]
20 May 2012, 8:15 am by Howard Friedman
Dismissal was recommended as to various other claims, including failure to provide a Muslim or inmate chaplain.In Sweet v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
In the Amalfitano case, the Amalfitano's attorneys reference legislation promulgated in 1275.The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified two questions to the Court of Appeals concerning the application of Section 487 of the Judiciary Law insofar as it provides that:"[a]n attorney or counselor who: . . . is guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party . . . [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida indicted Rutgerson with one count of:`using any facility and means of interstate commerce, [to] knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce an individual who had not attained the age of eighteen years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b). [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am by Nicholas Mosvick
United States, upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans by a 6-3 decision. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Rick St. Hilaire
“The Guild’s arguments ... are the same as those this Court has rejected time and again,” wrote Assistant United States Attorney. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
Moreover, the proclamation’s applicability only to non-visa-holders outside the United States puts it in the sweet spot of judicial deference to the political branches, as the Supreme Court showed in the travel ban case. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:19 am by Sheldon Toplitt
phonedog (Photo credit: Brad Weikel)In a 13-page complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, conversion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, a Delaware corporation based in Mt. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:28 am by The Docket Navigator
United States Patent and Trademark Office et al., 1-09-cv-04515 (NYSD March 29, 2010, Opinion) (Sweet, J.) [read post]