Search for: "United States v. Taylor" Results 221 - 240 of 1,552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The then-incumbent Food Safety and Inspection Service Administrator, Mike Taylor, became the acting Under Secretary from October 1994 to November 1996. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm by Unknown
  Other courtsin the United States, in deciding similar issues, have basically stated that equity (unjust enrichment) may provide hope for some compensation to the party whose cells have been utilized by researchers. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm by Unknown
  Other courtsin the United States, in deciding similar issues, have basically stated that equity (unjust enrichment) may provide hope for some compensation to the party whose cells have been utilized by researchers. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
United States of America v Tuggle – did establishing three CCTV cameras, encircling a man’s house for 18 months violate his privacy rights per the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 11:22 am by admin
Earlier this week, the United States Surgeon General, Dr. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:09 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  According to an article by David Lieb of the Associated Press, in the United States, only New York, Louisiana, and California have such apps right now. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
Michael Flynn recently seemed to call for a military coup in the United States, Myanmar-style. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:02 am by Gene Takagi
… The Delta variant “appears to be significantly more transmissible than even the Alpha variant or the UK variant, which is now dominant in the United States,” [US Surgeon General] Murthy told CNN. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm by Nathan Sheard
In the weeks and months following the nationwide protests against police violence, we continued to work closely with our fellow Electronic Frontier Alliance members, local ACLU chapters, and other dedicated organizers to support new bans on government face surveillance across the United States, including in Boston, MA, Portland, OR, Minneapolis, MN, and Kings County, WA. [read post]