Search for: "United States v. Taylor" Results 21 - 40 of 1,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:41 am
How could applying these decisions have an impact on State employees in the collective bargaining units represented by CSEA? [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:06 am
The Taylor case is the jewel in the crown of the SCSL, as it was the first ever trial and conviction of a former African head of state for crimes committed in a neighboring state. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Reassignment of unit work to nonunit employees an improper practice under the Taylor LawMonroe County v New York State Pub. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:05 am
In his latest broadside against Judge Sonia Sotomayor, Stuart Taylor revisits Ricci v DeStefano. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:50 pm by Aurora Barnes
Issue: Whether Taylor v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 6:48 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-1189 Issues: (1) Whether the categorical approach set forth in Taylor v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:50 pm
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 379-80 (2000) (plurality opinion). [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:50 am
Determining membership in a negotiating unit for the purposes of collective bargainingRockland County v Federation of Teachers Local 1817, 275 AD2d 413Clearly the incumbents of positions in the negotiating unit are covered by collective bargaining contracts negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law.Is an agreement between the parties to include a particular individual in the negotiating unit if the position filled by that individual is not included in the… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926), but they never acknowledge that the Brandeis dissent was rooted in a commitment to participatory democracy that Reynolds did not share. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 11:16 am by Eric C. Chaffee
The following law review articles relating to securities regulation are now available in paper format: Taylor Essner, Note, Insider Trading in Flux: Explaining the Second Circuit's Error in United States v. [read post]