Search for: "United States v. Taylor" Results 21 - 40 of 1,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
” Sufian Taha and Adam Taylor report for the Washington Post. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li  Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
United States Taylor Swift is threatening legal action against the Florida college student who tracks the private jets of celebrities and public figures, including Swift. [read post]
Unlike Europe’s comprehensive privacy law, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the United States only has a conglomeration of laws that target specific types of data. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
We have recorded 2,403 communities using identity disclosure versus 2,196 reverse sting operations in cities and counties across the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Costantino, Taylor Iaculla, and Andrew Scroggins Seyfarth Synopsis: One of the most anticipated employment cases of the term has been argued before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]