Search for: "United States v. Taylor" Results 121 - 140 of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:32 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:09 am
United States, 495 U. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 8:14 pm by Steve Kalar
  Thankfully, however, attorneys can’t concede for their clients (at least, can’t concede plea facts that haunt later Taylor analyses).United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 4:35 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The Copyright Act provides that "no civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until pre-registration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Dan Greenberg (The Arkansas Project) notes that the report of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:37 am
PERB rules employer’s conducting a survey of unit members to determine if a recognized or certified collective bargaining agent should continue to represent the unit an improper employer practice Matter of Monroe County v New York State Pub. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Grieving alleged out-of-title work assignmentsBailey v GOER, 259 AD2d 940Sometimes a Taylor Law contract will include a provision barring unit members from being assigned to perform “out-of-title” work. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Laura Taylor Swain this week in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 2:54 am
Taylor III, Respondent (FINRA AWC)Supreme Court Denies Defendants’ Challenge to CFTC’s Enforcement AuthorityUS Supreme Court Says "Bookings.com" Is Not An Ineligible Generic Name Per Federal Trademark United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]