Search for: "United States v. Taylor" Results 141 - 160 of 1,116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2007, 4:51 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]No. 07-5439 _________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________________________ RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Union presence during an interrogation of a unit member by the appointing authority Seabrook v City of New York, 57 AD3d 232 Norman Seabrook, individually and as President of the Correction Officers' Benevolent Association, challenged the policy of not allowing an employee to consult with a union representative after a question is posed and before an answer must be given, at an interrogation conducted pursuant to [New York City] Mayoral Executive Order No. 16. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 9:49 am
Robb Report magazine has consistently ranked it one of the nation's "10 Top Affluent Communities" for "some of the most beautiful mansions, best shopping and finest restaurants in the Southeastern United States". [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:01 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Polling Issue The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit issued an opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth lets us reach back to discuss the strong decision by Judge Goodwin in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:20 am by Wendi Overmyer, N.D. Ohio
United States, 131 S.Ct. 2382, 2393 (2011), a district court may state the sentence allows “the opportunity to rehabilitate himself” and may discuss rehabilitative opportunities in prison. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:13 pm
No. 07-5439 _________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________________________ RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:21 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
  On consideration of the certified issue, __ M.J. __, (Daily Journal Apr. 3, 2015), the briefs of the parties, and in view of United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
United States, No. 08-728, to address a question that has divided the courts of appeals regarding the operation of the Speedy Trial Act. 1. [read post]