Search for: "United States v. Teague" Results 1 - 20 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2013, 2:33 pm by Stanley Radtke
United States, Slip Opinion No.: 11-820, from the 7th Circuit holding that their prior decision in Padilla v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:51 pm
On October 31, the United States Supreme Court will hear argument in Danforth v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:27 pm
§ 2255 asserting that a federal sentence must be corrected due to error under United States v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:32 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Danforth v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The Court was asked to consider whether state supreme courts are required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 9:50 am
The Court was asked to consider whether state supreme courts are required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
In federal-habeas review and in some states’ post-conviction review processes, this inquiry centers on applying the federal-retroactivity analysis announced in Teague v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:27 am by Kevin Johnson
United States, which raises the issue of the retroactive application of Padilla v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  A state can, if it likes, apply a new rule retroactively in its own courts even if the federal rule of Teague v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:21 am
Minnesota (06-8273): "Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]