Search for: "United States v. Teague" Results 21 - 40 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2017, 7:49 pm by Jon Katz
Every once in awhile, the United States Supreme Court issues a great decision for criminal defendants. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:18 pm by Nora Demleitner
United States, which declared the Johnson rule substantive for purposes of the retroactivity analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:05 am by Nora Demleitner
United States, which declared the Johnson rule substantive for purposes of the retroactivity analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:12 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
In federal-habeas review and in some states’ post-conviction review processes, this inquiry centers on applying the federal-retroactivity analysis announced in Teague v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Washington (2004)), and a similar issue in the federal guidelines system (United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Rory Little
United States was not, after oral argument, much of a surprise. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  A state can, if it likes, apply a new rule retroactively in its own courts even if the federal rule of Teague v. [read post]