Search for: "United States v. Temple" Results 1 - 20 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This tradition is a byproduct of the complicated history of marriage in the United States, in which the civil and religious components of marriage have been intermingled. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
United States, ___ U.S. ___ (June 17, 2019). [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:24 pm by Lawrence Solum
Mnuchin, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected the argument that the parsonage exemption violates the Establishment Clause. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Temple, Register of Copyrights and Director, U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
The petitioners here argue that the State's exclusion of religious buildings—because they are religious—from Morris County's historic preservation program constitutes unconstitutional discrimination against religion in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Beasley School of Law) has posted The Implied Powers of the United States on SSRN. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:27 am
United Card Company, 429 F. 2d 1106 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1970; for an equivalent precedent in England & Wales, think Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas [2012] EWPCC 1, 12 January 2012, see previous post hereand here). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am by rstokes
Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
  In A v United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights concluded that ‘the broader an [MP’s] immunity, the more compelling must be its justification in order that it can be said to be compatible with the Convention’ ([78]). [read post]